2017年5月29日星期一

20170529 Hong Kong Taxi, Speculative bubble, License, Speculators



Good to see incisive analysis on the HK taxi market with similar conclusions as our article (see link at end)... when will the bureaucrats start doing something proactive and sensible for a change?

Hong Kong Taxi, Speculative bubble, License, Speculators
by Jake van der Kamp
 



Our original article on the taxi situation was posted here: http://yulun2012.blogspot.hk/2016/12/blog-post.html#comment-form

20170527 樓市癲過九七:王震宇指政府好心做壞事 樓價乾升

[東方財經]

【癲過九七】王震宇指政府好心做壞事 樓價乾升

長實地產 (01113) 旗下荃灣海之戀第1期今日開售,買家逼爆搶購出現排隊人龍。Bricks and Mortar Management創辦人兼總裁王震宇坦言,這是政府做出來的好事,本來好好的二手市場,現時封殺到想買樓的,又借不到錢等,令購買力全擠去一手市場,因發展商可以提供各項優惠,因此在二手市場買不成樓的人士,全湧去買新樓。

王震宇續指,政府好心做了壞事,因香港大發展商可以成功去貨。他又說,政府應該放棄各項干預樓市的政策,否則最終情況是政府決定呎價,以辣招控制樓價,香港將淪為最不自由市場。

他直指,若香港樓市一直自由發展,樓價或已見頂回落。從來買樓要因應買家需要及能力,但現時政府官僚動作增加,並非買家所想,因政治風險太大。無論置業是基於自用或投資,均不宜在當下入市。由於政策造成樓價高度波動,現時樓市已風高浪急,樓價亦僅由零丁成交推高。他估計,樓市一旦向下急跌,市場難見買家接貨,因現時樓市「乾升得緊要」,市場承接力不足
 

原文:http://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/finance/20170526/bkn-20170526122926017-0526_00842_001.html

 

 

2017年5月23日星期二

【Now財經台 - 交易時段 20170522】

 【專家分析】政府出辣招控樓市是好心做壞事?

Now財經台】金管局上周五推出三項逆周期措施調控樓市,進一步收緊樓按。
Bricks & Mortar總裁王震宇表示,現時技術官員控制整個私人樓宇市場,是不正常及不健康的現象,令樓市猶如被封殺,市民失去買賣的能力。他解釋,本來打算去貨的賣家,由於交易成本愈來愈高,因此未能入市,導致市場的成交量嚴重萎縮,最後只有發展商能夠去貨。
他直言,政府是「好心做壞事」,而且樓市干預太深,對銀行、印花稅等各方面的調控都已達到計劃經濟的程度,若樓市成功下調,下跌的幅度或會超出政府所預期之外。



Does HK have the right amount of office and retail space?



With the record smashing office land sale last week in Central where both the lump sum and unit price hit all-time highs (HK$23bn and HK$50,000 per square foot respectively), it seems an opportune moment to look into the dynamics of commercial land supply in Hong Kong.

As can be seen in Chart 1 below, both the office stock and retail space have been growing steadily in the past three decades. However, one cannot fail to notice that the speed of growth in office space has been outpacing that of retail consistently – this has led to the office-retail stock ratio rising from 0.62x in 1981 to 1.04x in 2016 – a massive outperformance of 69% over the entire period.

Chart 1: Gross floor area: office has grown persistently faster than retail
 

Last week’s record high office land sale price tag may be due to a combination of factors, including an ultra-low interest rate environment, increasing demand from China’s burgeoning corporate sector looking to expand overseas (via HK), thereby pushing up rents and prices here.

However, this could be said for retail space also, where ever rising PRC tourists should have done the same to retail property demand, so why has office still raced ahead in its stock build up, leaving retail in the dust?

Shifting consumption pattern: from goods to services

We suspect that the faster growth in office inventory compared to retail space may have something to do with the changing mix of the Hong Kong economy at large, where a greater part of consumption is now undertaken in the form of services rather than goods alone.

By comparing service consumption dollar to retail dollar over the years, it becomes apparent that services have grown significantly faster than retail – from 0.9x of retail back in the 80s to around 2.5x in the noughties (X axis, Chart 2). Throughout this period, there seems to be a matching growth in the ratio of office stock versus retail space (Y axis). Apart from a short period of volatility where the service-retail ratio fell in the past 4-5 years (red oval), likely caused by a disproportionate explosion of mainland visitor numbers, the relationship has held very neatly in a linear fashion.

Chart 2: Stronger growth of office stock driven by increasing share of service consumption
 

Looking more closely at the total consumption picture, we could see that the amount of services related consumption, which is largely produced, if not also consumed in office premises, has risen from 43% in 1981 to 60% now; over the same period, the more retail space intensive items of Food and Consumer Goods have seen their combined share drop from 58% to 47% (Table).

Table: Components and their weights in private consumption


This rising trend of services consumption can be visually represented in Chart 3 below, in fact, even the basket of household expenditure used to survey inflation has also witnessed a general drop in weighting for goods specific items (food, drinks, clothing and durable goods – see purple line in Chart 4) over the years.



Chart 3: Services weighting in private consumption in rising trend
 
Chart 4: Services weighting of household expenditure basket also rising

From bricks and mortar to clicks and mortar

Another new trend that has emerged in recent years is the exponential growth of online retail (Chart 5), meaning that increasing proportions of retail purchases may now be taking place in offices (eg online sales handling by e-commerce staff) and industrial/warehouse spaces (which supports the logistics of the online retail sales), this will obviously become more important in influencing demand for both office and retail space in future.

Chart 5: Number of HK people employing online purchasing for personal matters (mils)

Why has office rent not outperformed retail then?

Given the faster rising demand for services, one might ask, why then has office rent not done significantly better than retail rent (Chart 6). The simple explanation could be that office stock has grown faster than retail space at the same time, keeping the magnitude of office rent increases in check. 

A more physical reason may be that office space can be stacked over many storeys without affecting its utility, while retail premises require large pedestrian foot traffic, convenient transport linkages, and high location visibility to be of value to retailers. This explains why retail facilities in most multi-storey commercial buildings are restricted to the lowest floors (often not more than three).

Chart 6: Average office rent still a fraction of retail rent (Kowloon, HK$psm/month)
 

But what of the future? Will office supply continue to outpace retail? Not necessarily, for two reasons: 1) as the increase in PRC tourist arrivals recover and potentially reach new highs, more specialty themed multi-storey shopping malls may be built, or converted from office blocks, provided the logistic issues of large foot traffic flows can be addressed; and 2) the new trends in mobile working and hot desking could reduce the need for office space at a per-worker level (e.g. some organisations expect >10% utilisation improvements in their office space by moving towards a hot-desking/co-location model), not to mention the emerging phenomenon of robo-workers and their threat to white collar professions.

Whatever the future holds, Hong Kong remains a hub of regional activity for both office and retail, and will only benefit from further above-average growths of the Asian economies. In that regard, both subsectors should see trend outperformance compared to other global office/retail hubs in more mature cities.


With special thanks to Miss Rhonda Zixuan Lai (賴子萱) for her contribution to this article.