Coronavirus Vaccine Safety Warning - Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, in this excerpt from the Pennsylvania Medical
Freedom Conference on October 22, 2020, shares his concerns about the
forthcoming coronavirus vaccines – the skipping of trial phases, and how
he finds the entire vaccination system “backward” and corrupt.
“Lockdowns Save Lives.”- an exceptionally strange slogan for its assumption that any evidence
existed that vindicated the efficacy of lockdowns. But after only a few
months of lockdown, it first became apparent that there was no
correlation between how soon a region locked down and that region's
death toll:
The Costs of Locking Down- Not only have the lockdowns played no role in disease mitigation, they come with deadly costs.
if you are still waiting for more scientific proof that
the covid is no more harmful than normal flu, here are 15,000 more
pieces of them... so see below, and spread the message if you are
getting sick staying home, or losing job because your employer is
slashing staff or even going bust, etc. etc...
do you believe a few govt mouthpiece 'scientists' or the independent scientific community at large?
As infectious
disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave
concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the
prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused
Protection.
Coming from both the left and right, and around the
world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current
lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and
long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower
childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes,
fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to
greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and
younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping
students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these
measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable
damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.
Fortunately,
our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability
to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old
and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less
dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity
builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the
vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach
herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is
stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a
vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social
harm until we reach herd immunity.
The most compassionate
approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity,
is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives
normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection,
while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this
Focused Protection.
Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable
should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way
of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and
perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff
rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have
groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible,
they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A
comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to
multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within
the scope and capability of public health professionals.
Those
who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as
normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home
when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity
threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person
teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed.
Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home.
Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and
other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may
participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the
protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd
immunity.
On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:
Dr. Martin Kulldorff,
professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and
epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring of infectious
disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
Dr. Sunetra Gupta,
professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in
immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious
diseases.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya,
professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician,
epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert
focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.
2) this speech has 1.2M views, 50k likes... in a week
it seems the facade is starting to crumble ... if suits
start to be instituted around the globe, one might predict that in a
month's time, the scam would be fully discredited. A monumental
development indeed...
Because phase III trials won't be complete until late 2022, the plan seems to be to release the vaccines after interim trials for which the efficacy bar has been set very low indeed. They are required to be 70% effective at eliminating symptoms in around 50 PCR-positive subjects, out of thousands who receive the trial vaccine. The symptoms concerned can be very mild.
So, not only are the normal safety tests to be cut short, but the vaccines are not required to have any effect on anything that people are actually concerned about, such as:
- hospitalisation
- death
- durability of immunity (concerns have been raised by some about the durability of naturally-acquired immunity)
- being infectious while asymptomatic
- testing positive in a PCR test
- Long COVID or other complications
As the author says, "It boggles the mind and defies common sense that the National Institute of Health, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and the rest would consider the approval of a vaccine that would be distributed to hundreds of millions on such slender threads of success."
5) Some quotes from Dr David Nabarro, the WHO’s Special Envoy on Covid-19:
“We in the WHO do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of controlling this virus.”
“We really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method”
“Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is, making poor people an awful lot poorer”